Igneous Quill

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
Poverty and Worldly Passions 05/28/2010
0 Comments
 
"For the grace of God has appeared, bringing salvation to all, training us to renounce impiety and worldly passions, and in the present age to live lives that are self-controlled, upright, and godly, while we wait for the blessed hope and the manifestation of the glory of our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ. He it is who gave himself for us that he might redeem us from all iniquity and purify for himself a people of his own who are zealous for good deeds." - Titus 2:11-14 NRSV

Nick Kristof is a journalist I can respect.  He goes to poverty-stricken areas of the world and shines a spotlight on injustice and inequality.  His reporting about people who depend on what they can find in dumps to survive inspired me to write about the problem from a theological perspective, which in turn prepared my heart and mind for "Dump Day" when it came to my attention.  Though there are times I agree with him in part while cringing at some of his ill-informed religious views, as in the article where he wrote of "two churches," he wins me over with his candor.  A prime example of this is in a recent article where he talks booze and tobacco as part of the cause of poverty.

There’s an ugly secret of global poverty, one rarely acknowledged by aid groups or U.N. reports. It’s a blunt truth that is politically incorrect, heartbreaking, frustrating and ubiquitous:It’s that if the poorest families spent as much money educating their children as they do on wine, cigarettes and prostitutes, their children’s prospects would be transformed. Much suffering is caused not only by low incomes, but also by shortsighted private spending decisions by heads of households.

This is a truth I found while serving in Brazil, South America.  While on the whole Brazil is not as miserable as most African nations, it is most definitely still a poor country in development.  Time and again as my collegues in mission and I studied the Bible with people in their homes, we found that one of the greatest sources of trouble for them was their "addictions."

Now, in the U.S. when I hear of  "addiction" it usually refers to full-blown alcoholism, drug use or possibly even nicotine.  In Brazil I heard the term thrown around a bit more frequently, and I'm beginning to believe that it's because many in the church there recognize the threat these habits pose to families.  There is moral and social harm done, and also financial harm.  If a father receives his wages on Friday and then spends the night out at a bar, what will be left for the family the next day?  Sadly, this is a scenario played out on a regular basis in Brazil and elsewhere.  Those in more well-to-do nations can often make do, but for those living just at the line between having a place to live with food on the table and being hungry on the street, spending on luxury addictions isn't the best choice.

Look, I don’t want to be an unctuous party-pooper. But I’ve seen too many children dying of malaria for want of a bed net that the father tells me is unaffordable, even as he spends larger sums on liquor. If we want Mr. Obamza’s children to get an education and sleep under a bed net — well, the simplest option is for their dad to spend fewer evenings in the bar.

One young couple we studied the Bible with during my time in Brazil had three beautiful young daughters.  The oldest was around 10 at the time, and the youngest was just a toddler.  This vibrant couple really seemed to be getting into our studies, but there was a roadblock.  They knew that if they were baptized into Christ they'd be expected to stop going out drinking.  It wasn't that we taught people to abstain entirely.  The trouble was that this couple really enjoyed going out and getting plastered together.  They said it was one the the things they shared in common.  Worse still, when they went out they left those little girls alone.  Beyond the money they were squandering so they could come stumbling home in the wee hours of the morning, "three sheets to the wind," they were putting their children in danger.

Kristof proceeds towards the end of his article to provide various possible solutions to the problem.  For my part, let me say that sometimes I come down way too hard on churches and ministries that don't incorporate some element of social justice and community development into their work.  This is something I've criticized myself for recently.  Though I believe this to be the case, I do not want to leave the impression that personal evangelism that includes a challenge to repentance has no place.  In fact, it is the core of what the church does.  Our mission is more than meals, shelter, education and job training, as vital as these are.  None of these have any lasting meaning or value if we are not also challenging ourselves and others to live new lives that demonstrate the new creation that is breaking into this world from God.

Well-meaning humanitarians sometimes burnish suffering to make it seem more virtuous and noble than it often is. If we’re going to make more progress, and get kids like the Obamza children in school and under bed nets, we need to look unflinchingly at uncomfortable truths — and then try to redirect the family money now spent on wine and prostitution.

Let's be honest about all the causes of poverty, and let's work to get people to deal with them.  Even a church that only focuses on "Gospel preaching" can bear lasting fruit measured in transformed lives and families, though of course I think it's missing valuable tools in expanding the effect.

"Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; the old has gone, the new has come!" - 2 Corinthians 5:17 (NIV)


See: Moonshine or the Kids? (NYTimes)
Add Comment
 
Making Mockery 05/21/2010
1 Comment
 
Have you ever heard of “crocoduck”? It’s a fictitious creature apparently invented by actor-turned-clergy Kirk Cameron. He was attempting to attack transitional forms in evolution, and it looks as though he bungled it rather badly. His mockery of a key component in evolutionary theory sheds no more light on the topic than the Flying Spaghetti Monster does on theism.
The Flying Spaghetti Monster is a popular parody deity. Atheists use the odd creature to argue that faith in such a being makes no more sense that in the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.
The trouble with both crocoduck and the Flying Spaghetti Monster is that neither truly takes the subject matter seriously and neither considers the evidence (or even sources of knowledge). They are nothing more than ham-fisted attacks on a rival worldview, rather than honest attempts to dissect and discuss the available information.
Don’t get drawn in to lampooning those with whom you disagree. Mockers are fools. Be wise and have ears to hear, a heart to feel and a mind to consider.

"Happy are those who do not follow the advice of the wicked, or take the path that sinners tread, or sit in the seat of scoffers; but their delight is in the law of the Lord, and on his law they meditate day and night." - Psalm 1:1-2 NRSV
1 Comment
 
The Aaronic Priesthood: Comparing the Bible with the Book of Mormon 05/14/2010
0 Comments
 
The following was written in either 2001 or 2002.  At the time I thought this was the major Achilles Heel of the Book of Mormon, for those who take it as a real account of history.  That is, if the blatant anachronisms weren't enough by themselves.

WHO COULD BE A PRIEST ACCORDING TO THE MOSAIC LAW?

The Bible This Priesthood is only for lineal descendents of Aaron.

See Numbers 18:1-7  (Especially verses 1 and 7).

Numbers 18:7 Therefore thou and thy sons with thee shall keep your priests Office for every thing of the altar, and within the veil; and ye shall serve: I have given your priests Office unto you as a service of gift: and the stranger that cometh nigh shall be put to death.

The Book of Mormon It has a priesthood based on invalid descent.

See First Nephi 5:14; 2 Nephi 2:4; 5:26; Jacob 1:18-19.

2 Nephi 3:4 For behold, thou art the fruit of my loins; and I am a descendant ofJoseph
 who was carried captive into Egypt. And great were the covenants of the Lord which he made unto Joseph.             
2 Nephi 5:26 And it came to pass that I, Nephi, did consecrate Jacob and Joseph, that they should be priests and teachers over the land of my people.

WHO COULD OFFER SACRIFICES ACCORDING TO THE MOSAIC LAW?

The Bible Only the Aaronic Priests could offer sacrifices.

See Leviticus 17:1-9.

Leviticus 17:8,9 And thou shalt say unto them, Whatsoever man there be of the house of Israel, or of the strangers which sojourn among you, that offereth a burnt offering or sacrifice, and bringeth it not unto the door of the tabernacle of the congregation, to offer it unto the Lord; even that man shall be cut off from among his people.

The Book of Mormon Sacrifices offered by non-Aaronic Priests.

See 1 Nephi 2:7; 5:9; 7:22.

1 Nephi 2:7 And it came to pass that he built an altar of stones, and made an offeringunto the Lord, and gave thanks unto the Lord our God.

WHERE COULD SACRIFICES BE OFFERED?

The Bible Sacrifices are only acceptable in the place chosen by God.

See Deuteronomy 12:11-14; Leviticus 17:1-9.

Deuteronomy 12:13, 14 Take heed to thyself that thou offer not thy burnt offerings in every place that thou seest: But in the place which the Lord shall choose in one of thy tribes, there thou shalt offer thy burnt offerings, and there thou shalt do all that I command thee.

The Book of Mormon A Temple in a place other than that one chosen by God.

See 2 Nephi 5:16; 3 Nephi 11:1.

2 Nephi 5:16 And I, Nephi, did build a temple; and I did construct it after the manner of the temple of Solomon save it were not built of so many precious things; for they were not to be found upon the land, wherefore, it could not be built like unto Solomons temple. But the manner of the construction was like unto the temple of Solomon; and the workmanship thereof was exceedingly fine.

Possible Objections:

Maybe God made another covenant with the Nephites. --

It doesnt resolve anything to say that maybe God established another covenant with the Nephites, because the Book of Mormon itself says that they followed the Law of Moses (2 Nephi 5:10).  According to this law, no man could offer sacrifices if he werent an Aaronic priest.  Also, according to the Law of Moses no place other than the Tabernacle (and later, the Temple) was acceptable to offer sacrifices.

 But God permitted Noah and others to offer sacrifices in other places. --

Before the Mosaic Law, the patriarchs Noah, Abraham and others offered sacrifices in various places.  After the coming of the Law, it was prohibited for any person to offer sacrifices in any place other than that one chosen by God among all the tribes. See in Joshua 22:10-34 what happened, when the people of Israel mistakenly thought that one of the tribes had constructed an altar to offer sacrifices.  See especially verses 19 and 29.

 Maybe the mother of Nephi, Jacob and Joseph was a  descendant of Aaron, and for this reason they could have the Aaronic Priesthood. --  

Doctrines and Covenants 68:21 clearly explains that inheritance of the Aaronic Priesthood passes only from father to son.  See also D&C 84:18; 107:69 and Exodus 40:12-15.

Since no one other than a Levite and descendent of Aaron could be a priest, how could it be  possible that Samuel legitimately served God in this fashion?

 1 Samuel 1:1 gives us the impression that Samuel was and Ephraimite.  In reality, the tribe of Levi never received a region  as the other tribes did when they conquered Canaan.  The Levites spread out everywhere in the land, and by the time of Samuel, Israelites were named after the region in which they lived, even though they were of other tribes.  For this reason, Samuel was an Ephraimite by region, but was really (genetically) of the tribe of Levi.  Aside from that, he was a descendent of Aaron (1 Chronicles 6:26-28) and thus completely qualified to be a priest according to Mosaic Law.

(All Bible Quotations from the King James Version. Citations from the Book of Mormon were taken from the LDS.ORG  website.) 
Add Comment
 
A Brief Evaluation of the Non-Instrumental Position 05/07/2010
1 Comment
 
A couple of weeks ago questions were asked on a Christian Churches/Churches of Christ Facebook group about why some churches don't use instruments (pianos, guitars, etc) in worship.  Not long after that the Christian Chronicle posted a piece on its blog asking whether or not this was a "tradition."  This is a sad topic that never dies.  The following is my very brief evaluation of the non-instrumental position.

Why do some churches not use musical instruments in congregational worship?

Essentially, the non-instrumental sisters and brothers have long made the case that if something is not specifically commanded, can be shown by example from Scripture or be inferred by logical necessity, the church ought not to do it. Since there is no command, example or necessary inference involving the early church using musical instruments in worship in apostolic times, they say it shouldn’t be done now.

This perspective is, with all due respect to the good Christians who sincerely hold to it, deeply flawed in many ways.

First, this is a very selective way of looking at Scripture. It leaves churches picking and choosing what is acceptable. As a result, some churches don’t have kitchens in their buildings. Why have buildings at all? Typically the answer is something along the lines of necessity.

Second, this approach to Scripture sets the church up for conflict and division. There are branches and sub-branches of the non-instrumental churches, many of which won’t even consider cooperation with churches outside their narrowly-defined sub-group.

Third, it is disrespectful to study the Bible as though it were a flat rule book. It isn’t. It is the God-breathed message received by humanity over many hundreds of years. Though we have it in a single volume, it is in fact a complete library representing diverse genres of writing. Looking only for commands, examples and necessary inferences misses the point of much that was written, and distorts understanding.

Fourth, although the Bible does contain useful instructions for how the church should be organized and function, the method used historically by non-instrumental brethren tends to put way more emphasis on finding a pattern for church organization and practice than on practical matters of real-life, individual discipleship.

Fifth, our non-instrumental siblings in Christ have received customs from their forefathers. These they reinforce by citing extra-biblical evidence to the effect that for at least the first 1000 of church history, instruments were not used to accompany congregational worship (another example of traditions followed). Frankly, much of what the church did historically could hardly serve as an example and certainly does nothing to annul the reality that there is no sin in musical accompaniment in congregational worship.

From what I’ve written you may draw the conclusion that I don’t care for these churches much. Little could be further from the truth. I graduated from Harding University (one of “their” schools) and worked alongside these brethren on the mission field in Brazil. Until recently my wife and I were members of a non-instrumental church in New Jersey. I have many very good connections within this part of our fellowship.

Further, the perspective I’ve described here is not as common as it once was. A few churches have introduced instrumental services, but even more are taking a softer line on this point, tending to view it as part of their heritage but not a test of fellowship.

I hope this helps to clear things up a bit. Of course, what I’ve written represents my understanding of the situation and is by no means offered as the last word on the topic.
1 Comment
 
    Picture
    Adam Gonnerman - Former missionary, ESL teacher, customer service rep, social media manager and web producer; currently employed as a project manager in New York and volunteering through HOPE worldwide.

    RSS Feed


    View Adam Gonnerman's profile on LinkedIn

    Follow Igneous Quill:
    Facebook TwitterGoogle+ LinkedIn IgneousQuill.org IgneousQuill.net IgneousQuill.infoQuora
    • IgneousQuill.com
    • IgneousQuill.org
    • IgneousQuill.net

    Photobucket
    Photobucket



    Btn_wht_77x28

    free hit counters
    free hit counters

Create a free website with Weebly